A What is this all about?
For almost a decade, I have been harping on the Western bias of Organization Development, and how to align OD with global organizing.
My argument is that OD’s values and tools have a western bias which render OD inappropriate in global organizing. OD should not be the tool to impose western values, but rather the platform which enables various cultures to work together to get things done without cultural imposition of OD’s western ways. To claim that traditional OD has relevance for global organizing is preposterous.
B Where did I start? Where am I now?
I started this line of thought in the Organization Development Journal (Vol 21) in 2003 in my article “Making OD Global”, which was initially ignored and is now often quoted. For years after that, I engaged with junior and senior alike practitioners in the ODNET discussion group about the western boas of OD.
At present, I am engaging people about coming to terms with their Western bias in both LinkedIn Groups, and via this blog which has about 600 hits a day. I recently published an article called “Aligning Organization Development to Global Organizing”.
I am writing an exercise book for managers and consultants to expand their global awareness.
C) Resistance I encounter
A very small population of OD practitioners understands both my strategic direction and the derivative tactical need to cast aside concepts and tools of traditional OD in global organizations.
By and large, I encounter massive resistance to my ideas, and in this post I point out various ways in which my ideas are resisted.
1) There is nothing new except for Allon’s arrogance.
Folks who make this claim appear to understand that my argument, if correct, is very threatening to the status quo. Thus, I become part of the status quo.
2) “Allon may have a point, I need to acquire some intercultural skills”.
Folks who make this claim conveniently ignore the point that a global practitioner does not need some cultural understanding, but rather the ability NOT to act with a western bias.
3) “Allon exaggerates a bit”.
Folks who make this claim prefer to believe that “in the end, people are all the same; they want to be “open”, face saving does not apply to the young, and no one really wants to defer to authority”. OD is a process which will “enlighten” the East lies at the heart of this claim.
4) Some folks find my ideas so repulsive that I get hate mail.
5) Some folks agree that what I claim is true, but only in the global organization.
I find the word “only” pretty shocking, because everyone is obsessing about the future of OD, and global organizations is where the world is going.
D) Let’s not go on pretending
I waging this campaign, driven by an overwhelming feeling that OD can have universal application only if its key values/concepts and derivative tools are revised and adapted to global reality. Because OD does not “get” global organizing right.
In the past, I was a main line, traditional ODer, with a Tavistock background.I was a career officer for many years in the IDF, and that sure pushed me to conform.I graduated from Montreal’s McGill University and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, neither of which promoted too much intellectual innovation.
I will continue this campaign of mine, despite the very limited impact I am having on the way mainstream OD practitioners think about and “do” OD. I will do so because it needs to be done.