Strange behaviour in organizational life is not that strange

I have just finished reading Nancy Scheper Hughes ethnography Death without Weeping-The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil; this ethnography outlines how universal maternal instincts are not so instinctive nor universal. The death of young children In northeastern Brazil (Bom Jesus) is often “enabled” by the mother; no mourning whatsoever takes place, and even childrens’ names are not assigned until their death-in their lifetime they can be referred to as “little tykes” or miserable “critters”.

This brilliant yet shocking ethnography led me to think-are there organizations where everything we take for granted (the metaphor being maternal love) may be turned upside down on its head? My resounding answer is “of course”. Many organizations can define logic, or to be more accurate, the observers’ logic, which in our case in OD has very many biases.

I have been lucky enough to have worked all over the world; I want to point out 5 things that I have seen that are very logical if you see them from the inside, but quite in-comprehendible when observed out of cultural  context.

  1. A manager is seen as not deserving his stars until he brutally cuts down to size subordinates who may have been vying for his job.
  2. Meetings with no agenda and no discipline which generate effective decisions.
  3. Lying is acceptable behaviour as long as you make sure that the facts are stated in opaque mutterings.
  4. Structureless organizations with a rigid hierarchy.
  5. A rigid hierarchy where everything gets done via bypassing the system

In fact, I really do not think that we in OD (and management) really understand that  positive organizational behaviour  is not achieved by drinking some elixir or following certain principles. Each organization is, in many ways, sui generis, one of a kind.

Conclusions

The key conclusion is that organizational behavior cannot be reliably judged through universal management or OD (organizational development) principles alone. What appears dysfunctional from the outside may be functional within a specific cultural and organizational ecosystem. Therefore:

  • Organizational logic is context-bound, not universal.

  • Observer bias strongly shapes OD diagnosis and intervention.

  • Practices labeled “bad” or “irrational” may serve stabilizing or legitimizing functions internally.

  • Culture often overrides formal structure and stated values.

  • Each organization should be treated as sui generis—requiring ethnographic sensitivity rather than prescriptive frameworks.

The broader implication is that OD practitioners should adopt a more anthropological stance: suspend assumptions, study lived reality, and interpret behavior within its native context before prescribing change.

Share Button

A simpler place in time

Plenty of posts and videos show younger people being presented with, and ask to identify, things like dial-up internet, analog telephones and fax machines. My memories precede these artifacts.

I am going to date myself since this post deals with much older, even ancient, yet very beloved memories of the antiquated equipment/accessories that I have used, and worse than that, still wish they were in service today.

Our school desks all had ink wells, into which we inserted bottles of ink, provided by the Protestant School Board of Greater Montreal, aka Bureau métropolitain des écoles protestantes de Montréal. The Board also gave each pupil a fountain pen, and a nib. Upon hitting the floor, the nib would break, and ink would be splattered hither, thither and yon. Grace a dieu, we are also provided with blotting pads, to blot the ink from pearls of wisdom we wrote, and/or, for the ink which splattered on the floor.

You could break one nib, which could be labelled as unfortunate, or carelessness. Break two nibs, and you did not get a third strike, but rather a detention, meaning, walking home in the dark at 4 PM.

At the beginning of each school year, there was a sale of old text books, used by previous students. In each used book, there was a stamp which could read:

PSBGM

1961 Sherman Waxman

1962 Sophie LaLonde

1963 Glen Snow

I am not a materialist, but I always preferred new books, except for math. I knew that nothing could save my white ass from algebra or geometry. Whether or not you purchased a used book and bought a new one, a book cover was provided by  RBC Banque Royale, aka The Royal Bank of Canada. These paper covers featured  pics of bankers at work in a branch of course, as well as high buildings and places of employment.

Some teachers rationed these book covers, others believed “to each according to his needs”. I loved these book covers, and tried to weasel as many as I could. “And what is that wad of book covers doing in your hand?”

On each book cover were two lines: Name & Subject. We were all given one hour to wrap these books. “No need to giggle and chatter-wrap the books and then read one of them; this is not a social gathering. Did you hear what I said?”

New books and new paper covers each had a distinct smell. The ink made stains.

They all made sweet memories of a simpler place in time.

 

 

 

 

Share Button

Using photos as a leverage for organizational change

Some leaders are exceptionally talented at narrating problems out of existence. A real issue quietly shapeshifts into a more comfortable story: weak products become “sales challenges,” high turnover turns into “refreshing the ranks,” misalignment is reframed as “strong personalities,” and mediocrity gets a glossy rebrand as “cutting-edge.” The language changes—but the reality doesn’t.

In situations like these, I avoid arguing with words. Instead, I use images.

I’ll put up a single slide and ask one question: “What does this picture represent?”
That moment—when interpretation replaces defense—changes everything.

Over the years, this has included images such as:

  • Two teams laying railway tracks from opposite directions that never meet

  • People stepping off a building

  • A preacher addressing a sleeping congregation, with some congregants actively “sinning” in the pews.

  • A turd on the table that no one wants to acknowledge

The pictures do the work. They bypass rationalizations, surface what everyone already knows, and create space for honest, productive conversation.

It’s a simple technique—and remarkably effective.

Example

A picture of a torture chamber elicited the truth: this is the way we treat our clients, despite the verbiage of how much we “love” them

Two fat people having a big lunch whilst everyone else gets a few carrots : the CEO and the CFO are the only people who make decisions

A jail cell brings up murmurings of safely code violations

 

Share Button